Ugandan academy president speaks out on antigay law

first_img Country * Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d’Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People’s Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Norway Oman Pakistan Palestine Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Vietnam Virgin Islands, British Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Sign up for our daily newsletter Get more great content like this delivered right to you! Country The antigay law has been a trial by fire for Sewankambo, 62, who was elected to a 4-year term as UNAS president last January. Sewankambo, an internal medicine specialist and head of Makerere University College of Health Sciences who has spent years strengthening science capacity in Africa, spoke with ScienceInsider on the sidelines of a U.S. National Academy of Sciences meeting on collaboration with African science academies, held from 5 to 8 August in Washington, D.C. The transcript was edited for clarity and brevity.Q: What were the origins of the antigay law?A: The international community tends to think that intolerance for gays started after the Christian activists visited Uganda in 2009. That’s not correct. Just like in many African countries, intolerance for gays has been going on for years. The coming of the [Christian] group may have accelerated antigay feelings within the government. [Government officials] felt that they had support from the international community. They thought, “Oh, the timing is now right.”Q: After Parliament passed the antigay legislation last December, your academy was asked to weigh in?A: We were brought into the picture very late, a week or so before the report was required. I’ve been in the AIDS fight for 30 years, since the epidemic began. I was involved in documenting that AIDS exists in Uganda. To me, gays are part of society. When a request comes in to produce a report in 1 week on this issue, I said, this academy, which stands for independence, has to use evidence and produce a credible report. Let’s see, shall we be able to produce a credible report together in 1 week? This did not look like a task we can undertake in 1 week. I also knew that this report would define the reputation of this academy. If the report was not well done, if it was wishy-washy, it would put a label on this academy that would be difficult to shed. So we declined.Q: Was President Museveni’s office disappointed? A: I honestly don’t know; we’ve never interacted with them on that issue.Q: Now UNAS will study the issue with South Africa’s academy. What is the charge to the panel?A: Let me put it this way: The charge is still being refined.Q: How did the collaboration with South Africa come about?A: All the African academies were informed of the existence of resources to do a study to address the issue. The opportunity was there for any academy interested to join. So far, just South Africa and Uganda have said they want to participate. Ask yourself the question: Why won’t the others participate? Some say this is too hot an issue, they will not touch it with a 20-foot pole. That actually gives you a sense of the feeling of the rest of the African continent. It gives you a sense, this is untouchable. Some say, How will the public look at me: I was part of a report that is pro-gay? We have heard all of those comments.Q: Uganda has paid a diplomatic price over the law. Has Uganda’s scientific community suffered?A: No. To me, Western countries have overreacted. I think it will take time for acceptance of the gay community [in Uganda]. It will take time. After all, even here [in the United States] there are states where these are real issues. There are still states where [homosexuality] is taboo. It’s unreasonable to expect our country to change overnight. Come on.Q: Is the law shelved for now?A: The government is free to appeal, and they haven’t indicated yet. They are still thinking through it. The government may say we are not going to follow this up. But members of Parliament are free to reintroduce it. Click to view the privacy policy. Required fields are indicated by an asterisk (*)center_img On 1 August, a Ugandan court struck down a draconian antigay law that had drawn condemnation from Western countries. The legislation, signed into law on 24 February by Uganda President Yoweri Museveni, mandates prison terms of up to 14 years for homosexual acts and life imprisonment for “aggravated homosexuality,” such as sexual acts with a minor. The court invalidated the law on a technicality, citing Parliament’s passage of the legislation without a legal quorum the previous December.In the days before Museveni signed the bill, the Uganda National Academy of Sciences (UNAS) avoided being drawn into the controversy by declining a request from the government to conduct a rushed review of the scientific evidence about the causes of homosexuality. Instead, it will team up with the Academy of Science of South Africa for an in-depth study expected to be completed next year, says UNAS President Nelson Sewankambo.In justifying his support for the law earlier this year, Museveni cited the findings of a Health Ministry panel tasked with preparing the cursory literature review that UNAS declined to tackle. The rapid effort—the panel had less than 2 weeks to produce its report—concluded that “there is no definitive gene responsible for homosexuality,” that homosexuality is not a disease nor abnormal, and that being gay can be influenced by environmental factors such as culture and peer pressure. In a letter to U.S. President Barack Obama on 18 February, Museveni stated that the panel’s “unanimous conclusion was that homosexuality, contrary to my earlier thinking, was behavioural and not genetic.” Emaillast_img

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *